Published: May 23, 2025
Introduction: The Institutional Challenge
This Campus Accessibility Spotlight focuses on early efforts at The University of Texas at Austin to build a more accessible Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) pipeline for all students, including students with disabilities. STEM fields are in high demand for skilled graduates, making them both an essential talent pool for US businesses and an attractive career path for college students. Disabled students remain a great untapped resource in STEM fields. Interviews with multiple campus partners indicated that there are significant resources and training available to support students, but that greater awareness is needed for a systematic impact.
The Pain Points
- Variability in disability means that one size does not fit all for accommodations or access considerations.
- Rigid degree requirements and course sequences means that needing to delay one component of the degree has significant domino effects on degree completion.
- Many students do not disclose and receive accommodations, particularly in their early years as undergraduates. This is at the same time as students enroll in high stakes prerequisite courses, meaning that they miss out on the support that accommodations might give them in these essential gateway courses.
- Some STEM faculty pride themselves on “weeding out” students, which has an impact on flexibility and willingness to implement accommodations and accessibility strategies. This also fosters a “cut throat” culture and high levels of competition – not cooperation – between students.
- The specialized tools and equipment needed for STEM research and training are often not built with disability and accessibility in mind. This includes software, hardware, and learning materials. Specific to STEM are features such as equations, graphs, and diagrams that convey critical information.
- Lab work and other activities prevalent in STEM often require long hours in succession, following verbal instructions, and are seen as unable to be flexible or accommodating to achieve lab goals.
- The task of finding accessible tools, software, or applications often falls on the disabled student instead of the instructor or institution. This can be a long and burdensome process that can include research about accessible options, figuring out how in-class accommodations work with additional technology, and managing communication between multiple parties.
- High reliance on teaching assistants, particularly for large courses or lab sessions, leads to higher levels of variability in knowing how to respond to accommodations requests. Large class sizes in general can lead to greater restrictions in flexibility.
- Disabled students may not be encouraged to enter STEM fields due to ableist views about what disabled people can and cannot do in technical settings.
Meet the People
Students and leaders involved in various campus resources at UT Austin were extensively interviewed by the National Disability Center about their work to support Disability Cultural Centers. Those leaders interviewed were:
Nicole Garcia
Undergraduate Student | Cockrell School of Engineering
Student Fellow | National Disability Center for Student Success
Role: Studies rehabilitation engineering, disability advocacy and creating accessible environments through innovative design.
Desirée Lama, MA
Doctoral Student | College of Education
Coordinator of Student Partnerships | National Disability Center for Student Success
Role: Doctoral student researching the effects of ableism on students with disabilities to develop inclusive educational practices. She also leads and supports the Center’s Student Fellows.
Earl Huff, Jr., PhD
Assistant Professor | School of Information
Faculty Cadre Member | National Disability Center for Student Success
Role: Focuses on the intersection of human-computer interaction and accessibility, with a particular emphasis on improving the digital learning experiences of disabled students. He brings expertise in accessible design and the use of technology to reduce barriers in education.
Maura Borrego, PhD
Professor | College of Education and Cockrell School of Engineering
Director | Center for Engineering Education and Professor of Mechanical Engineering and STEM Education
Faculty Cadre Member | National Disability Center for Student Success
Role: Studies engineering and STEM higher education, including faculty, graduate students and undergraduates. Research leader in barriers that affect disabled students in STEM fields.
Jen Moon, PhD
Professor of Instruction | College of Natural Sciences
Vice Provost for Professional-Track Faculty | Faculty Affairs
Faculty Cadre Member | National Disability Center for Student Success
Role: Studies engineering and STEM higher education, including faculty, graduate students and undergraduates. Research leader in barriers that affect disabled students in STEM fields.
Michael Marder, PhD
Professor | Department of Physics
Executive Director | UTeach Natural Sciences
Director | Center for Nonlinear Dynamics
Role: One of the original designers of UTeach at the University of Texas at Austin ,a university-based secondary STEM teacher preparation program. Out of this original program, a number of STEM education initiatives have grown, including creation of UTeach programs at universities across the nation.
Implementation Steps and Milestones
- Examine where structural rigidity can be addressed.
- Improve accessibility of course tools and Learning Management Systems.
- Collaborate with libraries, educational and assistive technology resources, accommodations offices, and Disability Cultural Centers.
- Train faculty and teaching assistants on accessibility mindsets and practical strategies.
- Bring disability to research teams as a specific knowledge base and skillset, instead of only viewing disabled people as clients.
- Invite conversations about disability and accessibility into department meetings.
- Spotlight news stories and profiles of students and faculty with disabilities to help normalize accessibility as part of STEM degrees.
- Connect Disabled STEM students with peer and faculty mentors.
By The Numbers
25
24
18
Sources: Borrego et al. (2025). IJ STEM Ed, 12(2); U.S. Census Bureau (2022), ACS 2021 1-Year Public-Use File; HigherEd Today (2018), STEM Climate for Students with Disabilities.
Fresh Insights
Unexpected Revelations
STEM is both part of the problem and part of the solution, because the same field that makes things inaccessible is also the one inventing tech to fix it.
University learning centers don’t have many staff who understand disabilities and close to none have training with assistive technology. So, they have difficulty combining learning strategies with how these can work with assistive tech because they don’t know about assistive tech or disability.
Flexibility after COVID-19 pandemic showed how much support professors could offer when they weren’t restricted by bureaucracy. Faculty and staff were given license to help struggling students without always needing authorization from an office.
Strategies For Success on Your Campus
Additional Resources and References
Borrego, M., Chasen, A., Chapman Tripp, H., et al. (2025). A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(2).
Census Bureau. (2022, October 25). American Community Survey (ACS), 2021 1-Year Public-Use File. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20245/u-s-stem-workforce-size-growth-and-employment
Gin, L. E., Pais, D., Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2022). Students with disabilities in life science undergraduate research experiences: Challenges and opportunities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), ar32. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-07-0196
Landgren, E., & Borrego, M. (2024, October). “It’s just a lack of empathy, which is just honestly exhausting” – Engineering student experiences with ableism. [Paper presentation]. IEEE 2024 Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
Landgren, E., & Borrego, M. (2025, February). Student-based recommendations to increase accessibility in undergraduate engineering programs: “If there’s people who can’t access it, then it’s not accessible.” [Paper presentation]. ASEE 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Lillywhite, A., & Wolbring, G. (2019). Undergraduate disabled students as knowledge producers including researchers: A missed topic in academic literature. Education Sciences, 9(4), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040259
HigherEd Today. (2018, May 23). STEM climate for students with disabilities. https://www.higheredtoday.org/2018/05/23/stem-climate-students-disabilities/
Time. (2023, January 5). STEM education won’t improve until disability access is normalized. https://time.com/6241021/stem-education-normalize-disability-access/